The glacier has recently come to the forefront of the international debate on global warming. The US Forest Service, which manages the Mendenhall Glacier, says “because glaciers are a product of climate, they respond to climate change.”The Mendenhall glacier has been in retreat since the end of the Little Ice Age in the 1700s. In a joint article for the Juneau Empire Geologist Cathy Connor and Geophysicist Roman Motyka, both professors of the University of Alaska said “climatic warming coupled with ice loss through iceberg calving are the reasons the Mendenhall Glacier is retreating and shrinking.” It is expected the glacier face will soon pull out of the lake. * Source: Wikipedia
The retreat of the Mendenhall Glacier and other glaciers in the area is believed by some to be a result of broader retreat and breakup of the Juneau Icefield. The Juneau Icefield is the fifth largest icefield in North America. For many populations near glacial areas these glaciers are a source of fresh drinking water. Once these glaciers are gone the people relying on this fresh water will be out of their familiar fresh water source. For example, Anchorage is one of the most populated cities in Alaska and many people in this city rely on the Eklutna glacier for their freshwater. If the recession of this glacier continues they will be out of their main source of water.*
Although there are many negative effects of the recession of the Mendenhall Glacier and glaciers in general, there are also a few positive outcomes from it as well. With the retreat of the Mendenhall Glacier, the Mendenhall Lake has formed. The lake is a result of the run-off from the glacier and is increasing in size as the glacier continues to retreat. The lake began formation in 1929 and has continued to grow since then. The lake has its own unique ecosystem and is a nursery for a variety of fish including several type of salmon, Dolly Varden char, and cutthroat trout.*
thanks for the information
LikeLiked by 1 person
You’re most welcome.
LikeLike
There are all sorts of potential impacts from global warming that people haven’t imagined yet or have and are putting off thinking about. As an example, sometime in the not to distant future banks and mortgage companies are going to have to start planning how, if at all, they can justify continuing to offer 30 and 40 year mortgages on waterfront properties that may end up underwater during that time frame. Predictions are that low lying coastal cities are going to disappear; kind of a slow motion Atlantis scenario. I wonder how much serious thought has been given to that by the cities/states most likely to be impacted.
LikeLiked by 4 people
Very true David, the unforeseen economic impact will be significant. The projected costs by 2100 is expected to be $1.9 trillion annually.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Happy Weekend 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
Buon fine settimana, cara. 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
Majestic. I wonder if there will be any left by the end of my lifetime.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Hopefully, but currently it looks a little bleak.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Pingback: Against the Odds: Lifeguards | What's (in) the picture?
Lovely response to the challenge. I’m very concerned about the changes. Norway is experiencing the warmest winter in 60 years and Svalbard is the hottest place. The polar bears are crying and starving.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks, sorry to hear that polar bear habitat is already being affected.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Incredible shots!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Very kind, thank you. 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
This makes me so sad…and makes me want to start raving about Trump and the other deniers…but I won’t (not here 🙂 )
LikeLiked by 1 person
Twitter’s a good place to rant since that’s where Trump hangs out. 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
True! I hang out there as well and may have ranted on occasions as well 😉 (not like him though, nobody rants like him, ugh)
LikeLiked by 1 person